True Spirituality

Posted February 26, 2010 by OneFugue
Categories: religion, spirituality

True spirituality is dwelling within oneself, wrestling with ones feelings and emotions, sorting out the positive and real from the negative and unreal.  We naturally love the positive and the real when we find it, and we naturally grow toward it.

But it has to be sought, and it requires facing a lot of painful crap, which is why for so many it’s easier to just go through the motions and hope that their superficial belief in God will do the trick in the end (it won’t).  Others find it easier to not believe in God.

Actually, whether one believes or not doesn’t matter.  I don’t hold a belief in God, but I have greater faith (by my definition) and spirituality than most religious people out there.  What matters is where the person’s heart is at.  Is it selfish and fearful, or giving and open?  Are we good to ourselves and others, or do we hurt ourselves and others?

Defined by Procrastination

Posted November 24, 2009 by OneFugue
Categories: Uncategorized

If you’re not getting closer to something, you’re procrastinating and getting further away.  Every moment of delay opens the door to more and greater distractions and delays.  Rabbit trails, “way leads on to way.”  You can’t do everything.  So each moment is a conflict of what to do, and what to leave undone.  So that is the question of our lives:  what can we not leave undone?  The rest is meaningless.  And I’m not talking about “bucket list” stuff either.

Sex, Needs, and Self-fulfillment

Posted September 15, 2009 by OneFugue
Categories: Uncategorized

There is something really wacky about the nature of attraction.  It’s like a big confused muddle between all these different types and reasons for it.  There’s physical attraction (the secondary biological need for sex), loneliness (the psychological need for attention, because we don’t know how to fulfill ourselves), and the occasional attraction to people for who they are as a person.

But attraction based on the quality of character is not sexual attraction.  It can enhance sexual attraction (probably through our need for attention, by the value it creates) but it is essentially non-sexual.  It can occur between any two people (friends, family, strangers) and even between species (like between someone and their dog).

I have a theory that if we fail at fulfilling ourselves, then we will not usually be attracted to, nor be attractive to, someone who is self-fulfilling.  We will be afraid of or emotionally blocked toward self-fulfilled people, because we can sense that they don’t have a need for us.  Thus the fear of being left alone, unfulfilled.  And even if we have the courage to like them, they won’t be attracted to us because they can sense our neediness.

We will be attracted to those with needs more equal to our own, not wanting someone who will always give-in to us, nor someone who could leave at the drop of a hat.  We have this crazy need to get emotional fulfillment not through ourselves, but through someone or something else.  And as long as we look outside ourselves for our fulfillment, we’ll be unsatisfied over and over and over.

As a side note, I think that’s the trick to how Jesus “saves” people (for those that really do grow into better people).  He plays into people’s need for something external, but the further you get into it, the more you find you really have to do things on your own.  He doesn’t show up in person, and lives don’t magically become full and abundant overnight.  It seems like a mysterious supernatural process.  But there’s no mystery to me, because the Christians who do the deepest praying and soul searching are the ones who reap the benefit.  The ones who just go through the motions are interchangeable with everyone else.

So we’ll get involved with all kinds of crap out of our need for attention.  And like I said, the people we admire the most for their character, are the ones who are the most self-fulfilled, therefore don’t have a need for us, and aren’t attracted to us…  Unless we are both relatively self-fulfilled.  Then there can be a genuine appreciation for each other.  Genuine friendship and emotional sharing.  That’s the most important thing.

This just doesn’t seem to happen very often between people that want to have sex with each other.  It doesn’t matter.  Sex is only a secondary biological need.  Emotional sharing is more like a primary spiritual need.

For example, the boost I get from sharing my feelings with a friend who is totally open and real is far better than going out and getting laid.  Not only is there no risk for STD’s  🙂  but it will always remain a positive experience, no matter what happens. It’s like a good emotional scar, always there as positive emotional reinforcement.  Whereas, there’s nothing eternally good or praiseworthy about getting laid, no matter how great it may feel at the time.  Not that getting laid is necessarily a bad thing, it’s just more of a temporary appeasement of emotional and physical needs than it is anything real and genuine and lasting.

Transforming Lead to Gold

Posted September 10, 2009 by OneFugue
Categories: philosophy, psychology, spirituality, Uncategorized

Tags: , , ,

There was an interesting interview on the NPR show TELL ME MORE on Sunday night.  The author Stephanie Covington Armstrong spoke about her battle with bulimia nervosa.  She traces the root of her condition back to when she was 12 years old and was sexually assaulted by her uncle.

During the incident she pretended she was asleep, telling herself it wasn’t happening, until she felt emotionally separated from herself.  Later she started stuffing herself as a relief from the feelings of pain and isolation.  But, not wanting  others to discover her pain by seeing her gain weight, she became bulimic.

She was using the eating and purging as a way to run from her feelings, and it worked… until the feelings came back.  Eventually, she couldn’t stay ahead of her feelings.  She’d throw up and the feelings would come right back, all the low self-esteem and shame from being sexually abused.  Her coping mechanism was requiring more and more to provide less and less relief.  In fact, it was killing her and she knew it.

After bottoming out she started going to support groups and gradually learned to accept herself and to find more effective coping mechanisms like turning to people for support, journaling, and helping others.  It was a gradual process, and she didn’t stop overnight.  As she puts it, she was learning how to be good to herself, how to love herself.

Now she’s gotten to the point where if she finds herself reaching for something to eat, and she’s not hungry, she immediately starts an internal dialogue:  I’m not hungry, so what’s going on?  Maybe she discovers it’s a deadline she feels overwhelmed by due to a fear of failure, or of being found incompetent.  Whatever the cause, once it’s identified the urge to eat just goes away.  My theory here is that once we see what’s real, the unreal can’t survive.

So she learned how to take this tremendously self-destructive condition and turn it into a positive.  Instead of living with that overwhelmed feeling, missing a deadline, and confirming her fears, she gets an advance warning.  No longer being controlled and manipulated by her condition, she now uses it to serve her.  She uses the unhealthy urges to eat as a warning signal that something is wrong in her life and needs to be dealt with.

If only we all had such a direct link to our deeper self… But we do.  We all have feelings; we just either ignore and suppress them, or don’t know what to do about them when we do feel them.  The question is how bad do things have to get before we start tuning in?

I can’t prove it, but I have faith, that all negatives can be turned to positives.  It’s quite simple and elegant actually.  And it extends to everything which is negative.  We don’t have to wait for a condition to bring us to our knees (though that seems to be often what it takes to wake us up).

Anytime we feel even a slightly negative sensation, that’s our warning light.  Something is wrong.  Something.  And part of the process of learning how to be good to ourselves is the process of first listening to these warnings, then figuring out why we don’t feel good, and what we can do about it.  The solution may be a long and hard road, but if we don’t heed the warning signals, we’ll never be able to transform our pain into something good.

Doubt, God and Risk

Posted August 26, 2009 by OneFugue
Categories: philosophy, religion, spirituality

Tags: , , , ,

Are there different ways to doubt?  Is one type of doubt good for us, and another type negative?

On the one hand I believe that doubt can be a great motivator for people to personally verify the reality or unreality of something.  And I believe that personal verification is the ultimate and only real verification of “spiritual” and/or emotional truth.  Accept no substitutes, sorry no easy way out (reading books, listening to enlightened teachings and getting religion included).  So, as Buddha said, “believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.”  However, doubt can also be a cop-out for inaction; for being lazy, not trying, not challenging oneself.  For not struggling to come to terms with reality.  After all, until we really “know we know” something, why give up the search for that understanding merely because, to us, one side or the other seems unlikely or doubtful?

I’ve been thinking about the question of God’s existence (not to mention, who/what *is* God really?).  I have feelings, experiences and intuitions that pull me in both directions and there is no clear answer for me.  I simply do not know.  So, is it negative not to know something?  Is that even doubt?  It could be more like a barrier, or maybe a blank slate.  Either way, which is worse, not knowing something and admitting it, or not knowing yet choosing to believe in something (perhaps out of pressure, or in reaction against something else) that you really don’t know for sure?  The first path is at least honest, and more open to reality.  And that sounds good doesn’t it?  But I doubt even myself, and so I couldn’t help but think…

What if we make a deliberate conscious choice to invest our belief in something, despite our lack of knowledge?  This is in contrast to the way beliefs are often formed.  And I think there’s no question that beliefs which are formed on the basis of unconscious forces like societal pressure, are not well formed, and leave us suffering in confusion when circumstances challenge and threaten them.  But what about taking a risk and choosing to believe something, acting on it as if it were true, and following it through, even though you don’t know for sure?  Does this make sense?

Jesus tells the story of a man who trusts some money to three servants while he is away.  The first two double their allotted sums, but the third is very conservative, knowing his master doesn’t suffer fools lightly, and rather than risk losing any, buries his in the ground.  When the master returns, the third servant gets scolded for playing it safe, for not taking any risk, not even to let the money earn interest.  But what is this risk Jesus is talking of?  Are we supposed to take some risks in everything, including in what we believe?  I think the real key is not to be controlled by fear like the third servant was.  In the case of believing in God, I think the point (of belief) is really to get people to address how they live, not superficial modification of beliefs and behaviors.  However, I do think everyone should take a slightly different risk regarding their beliefs; and that is the “risk” of questioning and challenging them.  It can seem risky because what if we find out we’ve been going in the wrong direction all along?  Depending on what we’re confronting, this can be very frightening.

Why do we take risks?  For reward.  What’s the reward for believing in God?  Heaven?  Maybe, but it just doesn’t feel *real* to me (I could be wrong).  But a true Christian wouldn’t do good for the sake of going to heaven anyway.  Rather, the true Christian, or any truly good person, does good for the sake of good.  Their fruit is good because their heart is good.  A good person just naturally does good things without any selfish ulterior motive.  So what’s the point of taking beliefs and forming sides?  Beliefs are superficial.  They are a fruit of the heart, at best, not a shaper of the heart.  Faith, by the way, is different from belief (as I see it), but more on that another time.

What so many Christians and people in general don’t understand, is that if you want to really understand a person, you should pay much less attention to what they believe, and much more to how they live.  What good is a person who agrees with you on everything you believe, but is very selfish, negative and offensive to be around?  So the risk that I think is necessary, is taking the chance to do things we’ve never done before, face the unknown, face fears and uncertainties with the aim of making something positive out of it, rather than sitting on our laurels unchallenged, comfortable, and stagnating.  The point is to be alive, striving, moving and advancing….

Don’t accept your false self

Posted September 15, 2008 by OneFugue
Categories: philosophy, psychology

Tags: ,

I’ve noticed that I feel bad every time I think I might like someone (whether as a friend or potential mate), and don’t pursue a deeper interaction with them.  I have guilt for not expressing and exposing myself to them, regardless of what their response might be.  But often, I feel so locked up that it’s like I’m hitting a wall which blocks me from being genuine and open (“being myself”).  Sometimes this wall is so effective that I don’t even realize what happened until later.  Even if I do realize what’s taking place, I usually have no idea what to do about it. 

So I feel trapped inside myself by my fears and inhibitions, which not only frustrate me by blocking me from what I want, or think I want, but which also seem to create guilt for each opportunity (potential relationship) I let pass me by.  Maybe nothing would’ve come of it, but maybe we could have shared a wonderful relationship.   

On the other hand, as bad as I feel, I can’t force myself to open up more to people.  I could memorize certain phrases, things to say, or things to do, but it is too logical.  No matter what I might memorize, it cannot remove the emotional barriers.  Such efforts would only result in a superficial modification of behavior.  This basically involves learning to act a role, and hoping that someone (or better yet, everyone) will buy it.  If they do, then maybe we can have a pretend relationship, but not a real one.

And just knowing that I can’t force myself, logically or otherwise, to open up, helps relieve some stress.  We can’t consciously control our emotions, except to suppress them.  No matter how much we believe that it’s wrong to feel this way or that way, and that we really ought to feel some other way, our only choices are to either pretend to be what we think we should be (by inhibiting ourselves), or to accept how we feel, and try to understand why.  Nothing is wrong, as long as we try to understand why, why, why.

So if my emotions don’t want to open up, then of course I get frustrated when I expect (demand) it of myself.  On the other hand, to just “accept what you are” and do nothing about it is even worse, because this creates guilt for giving up.  Someone might say, “there’s nothing wrong with being shy around certain people.  It’s normal, and I’m not hurting anyone.  I accept myself for who I am, and so should you.”  But in every interaction that a person has emotional barriers, those barriers represent that person suppressing their self (whether consciously or not).  Furthermore, for a person to “accept” their inhibitions, is to accept an unreal self, thus rejecting their real self.

So there should be a balance between knowing/accepting one’s limits, and yet still struggling to do better and better.   Any real change always comes gradually, and ultimately, we have to learn to fulfill ourselves, rather than looking to others for fulfillment 

Suffering is Good

Posted September 15, 2008 by OneFugue
Categories: philosophy, psychology

Tags: ,

Life is a continuous stream of decisions, and I hate having to make decisions.Especially when I have no idea what to do. Furthermore, you often won’t know if you did the right thing until after it’s done. So, what makes a decision right or wrong, good or bad? It’s not always black and white, but the right decision is one that offers a real solution for us. One that leaves us feeling *genuinely* good. There may even be several good solutions. The wrong decision, however, may be an attempt at some solution, but it is unreal. For example, one of my favorite “solutions” is avoidance. It is so unreal that it doesn’t even pretend to be a solution (except to hope that things will “resolve themselves”). There are a countless number of unreal solutions to any problem. In contrast, there will be only one, or perhaps a small range, of genuinely good, or “real” solutions.

So, how do we know if something is real? This may seem a bit too simple, but we have to “feel how we feel.” Feelings are a simple and natural way to navigate the extremely complex world we live in. Basically, anything positive is real, and anything negative is unreal. It is extremely simple, yet for most of my life I couldn’t believe such a thing. I used to think that feelings and emotions were unreal, that they confused people and distracted them from reality. My sense at the time was that reality was some sort of detached impersonal unchanging truth, nothing to do with the ever‑changing fickle whims and fancies of people’s feelings.

It was clear to me then, and I still believe it now, that the greatest mistakes made by people occur when they get led astray by their feelings (usually in the form of needs and insecurities). However, I overreacted and became a victim of what I feared (getting led astray by my feelings). Thus, I failed to see the other side; that the only real and genuine good from people comes from their emotions as well.

So I’ve always distrusted my feelings, as well as those of others. No wonder though; society is very off-putting, like the hypocrites of the church. People act one way, even though it’s not really how they feel. Who would want to be a part of a world of emotions if it required becoming fake and superficial like everyone else? Of course, I was throwing the baby out with the bath water.

And I know I was going in the wrong direction because my life was steadily getting worse. I was becoming more and more confused and frustrated. Instead of becoming more stable, focused and clear minded (as I envisioned) by doubting and suppressing my feelings, the exact opposite was happening. I was completely lost and felt like I was going insane. Of course I was. I was rejecting my self. And feeling bad, as I said before, is how you know that you’re going the wrong direction.

For so many years I’ve conditioned myself to distrust my feelings, that I now have to constantly struggle against that tendency. This is the work of awareness. Being able to see and accept where you’re at, and slowly digging oneself out of your life’s worth of garbage. It’s tempting to wish that I had better parents (conditioning) from the start, so I didn’t have to go through this pain. But without suffering, how could anyone appreciate the depth and importance of these lessons? I can’t think of anything else that could motivate me enough to actually change.

Furthermore, how can anyone help others who are lost, confused and suffering, without first experiencing and conquering struggles of their own? Would you rather be a benign blob that lived out a monotone existence (with minimal experience of suffering)? Or would you rather experience the full range of lows and highs that life has to offer, becoming more and more able to relate to and genuinely help others?

The Comfort Zone

Posted September 15, 2008 by OneFugue
Categories: philosophy, psychology

Tags: ,

When most people are young, they are bright and more clear minded (having much fewer emotional barriers and inhibitions to confuse them).  But as we get older, we accumulate garbage in our psyche.  Each time we do something that creates guilt we’re adding to the garbage (assuming we don’t clean it up).  Then, after many years, the garbage starts to overflow.  This is when we can’t ignore it anymore and we’re compelled to do “something”.  Many people just pursue their escapes that much more zealously (work, alcohol, drugs, religion, aggressions, passiveness, and basically anything out of moderation).  They don’t want to open the “pandoras box” of garbage in their psyches. 

A few, however, will try to understand what is really going on.  We (the few) are searching for a real solution.  Ironically, when we were younger and more clear, and the challenges less severe, it was too easy to ignore and avoid stress, guilt and other garbage.  But now… now we have the motivation to *really* understand ourselves and work with ourselves, but at the cost of so many years of negative conditioning, with so much accumulated garbage to clean up.  The only thing to do is to kick yourself in the butt and clean up whatever it is that is getting you down right now. 

But, here’s where most people will clean up the bare minimum, get some relief, and stop… until next time; again cleaning up the bare minimum, and so on.  This is getting stuck in the “comfort zone”.  It actually ends up being an emotional roller-coaster that goes absolutely nowhere.  Instead of coasting after each success (back down into misery), the boost we get from cleaning up our garbage should be used to seek out and clean up more garbage.  It’s a matter of self-awareness;  of being aware of any negative feeling we have in order to understand why, and to resolve it.  And the more we resolve, the greater the challenges we will become aware of.  It’s always something we don’t want to do.  Something we may think we can’t face.  But that is precisely what makes it so exciting and vital.

Emotions and Neutrality

Posted September 8, 2008 by OneFugue
Categories: philosophy, psychology

Tags: ,

In a recent conversation somebody asked a lady how she would feel if a stranger came up, called her a bad name and walked away.  Would it make her feel good or bad?  She said “neither”, and that she would not feel hurt because that person “obviously doesn’t know what they’re talking about”.  But is it really possible to not have some kind of feeling in this situation?  And what kind of situation(s), if any, are genuinely neutral?

I believe that to be alive is to have emotions.  Some of us are more barriered from our emotions than others, but I believe that we all have emotions, no matter how hidden.  Furthermore, I would like to experiment with the idea that this element of human existence is not something we can turn on and off.  We can block our feelings from being expressed outwardly, and can even block them from ourselves, but we cannot remove them or shut them off.  They are there.  Also, whether we block them (from ourselves) or experience them is not within our conscious control.  When we are ready to consciously experience an emotion, we will feel it.  It will come up.

Is it possible for any emotion to be neutral?  That is, can an emotion be both ‘not positive’ (not even slightly) and ‘not negative’ (not even slightly)?  It doesn’t seem possible by definition.  Is it?  Is there anything about which you can say “I feel strongly neutral”?

The other possibility is that certain things stimulate our emotions, and certain things don’t.  Anything that doesn’t stimulate our emotions is neutral to us.  In this case the question is, can we experience something without even the slightest emotional affect?   That is, are emotions just one part of our mind that doesn’t always get involved?  Or, are emotions more fundamental to our mind, ever present, and always ‘touched’, like the surface of a pond, by our experiences?